Conception des enseignants universitaires marocains à propos de l’enseignement efficace
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Cette étude a deux objectifs : (1) déterminer les caractéristiques de l’enseignement efficace de point de vue des enseignants du supérieur ; et (2) identifier leur conception quant à ce concept. Les auteurs ont tenté d'atteindre ces objectifs par le biais d’une enquête. Douze enseignants universitaires, du département des sciences de la vie de la faculté des sciences, ont été sollicités répondre à un questionnaire qualitatif. Les résultats nous ont permis d’énumérer 23 caractéristiques de l’enseignement efficace. Leur répartition en catégories, nous a permis de conclure que les enseignants constituant notre échantillon adoptent une conception d’enseignement efficace axée sur l’étudiant.
Renseignements sur l'article
![Licence Creative Commons](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Références
Adams C.M. & Pierce R.L. 2008. Characteristics of effective teaching. www.bsu.edu/gradschool/media/pdf/chapiter12.pdf.
Allan J, Clarke K et Jopling M. 2009. Effective teaching in higher education: perceptions of first year undergraduate students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2009, 21 (3), 362-372.
Babbie E. 2008. The Practice of Social Research, 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Baumann E.K. 2007. All Are Called: Personality and Effective Teaching. CSE Volume 10 Number 3, 10-11
Becker D. M. 2010. Teaching Teachers About Teaching Students, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1105. Available at: http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol87/iss5/4
Biggs J. et Tang C. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University Third Edition. The Society for Research into Higher Education. Open University Press
Brown G. et Atkins M. 2002. Effective teaching in higher, first published 1988 by Methuen & Co. Ltd., This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203221365
Buskist W. 2002. Effective teaching: perspectives and insights from division two’s 2 and 4 year awardees. Teaching of psychology, V29(3), 188-193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2903_01
Chickering A.W. et Gamson Z.F. 1987. Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, AAHE Bulletin, 3-7.
Chism N.V.N. 2004.Characteristics of effective teaching in higher education: Between definitional despair and certainty. Journal on Excellence in college teaching, 15 (3), 5-36.
Clark J. 1995. Suggestions for Effective University Teaching. Retrieved from http://io.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark/acad/teach/effteach.html
Coe R., Aloisi C., Higgins S. et Major L.E. 2014. 'What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research.', Project Report. Sutton Trust, London.
Cohen L., Manion L.et Morrison K. 2000. Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Davis B.G. 1993.Tools for Teaching, A Publication in The Jossey-Bass Higher and adult education series, Copyright © 1993 by jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Dall'Alba G. 1991. Foreshadowing conceptions of teaching. Dans B. Ross (Ed.). Teaching for effective learning. Research and Development in Higher Education. Vol. 13, 293-297). Sydney: Herdsa.
Delaney J., Johnson A., Johnson T. et Treslan D. 2010. Students’ perceptions of effective teaching in higher education. The Morning Watch, 37, Nos. 3-4. Available from http://www.mun.ca/educ/faculty/mwatch/laura_treslan_SPETHE_Paper.pdf
Demougeot-Lebel J. & Perret C. 2010. Identifier les conceptions de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage pour accompagner le développement professionnel des enseignants débutants à l’université. Savoirs, (23), 51-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/savo.023.0051
Devlin M. 2007. Improving teaching in tertiary education: Institutional and individual influences. Keynote address at Excellence in Education and Training Convention, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore.
Dunkin M. J.1990.The induction of academic staff to a university: processes and products', Higher Education20, 47-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162204
Feldman K. A. 1976. The superior college teacher from the student’s views. Research on Higher Education, 5, 243-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991967
Feldman K.A. 1997. Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: evidence from student ratings. In R.P. Perry and J.C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp.368-395). New York: Agathon Press Kane R., Sandretto S. &
Fox, D. 1983. Personal Theories of Teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 8 (2), 151-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078312331379014
Friesen E. et Kristjanson C. 2007. A handbook Teaching at the University of Manitoba. University Teaching Services. The University of Manitoba, 3rd ed
Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The Impact of Training of University Teachers on Their Teaching Skills, Their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of Their Students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404040463
Goe L., Bell C. et Little O. 2008. Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: A Research Synthesis; National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness—1 June
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Handwerk, Carson et Blackwell. 2000. On-Line Vs. Paper-And-Pencil Surveying of Students: A Case Study, 19p.; Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research (40th, Cincinnati, OH, May 21-24,2000). ED 446512.
Heath C. 2004. An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasizing reflective practice. Higher Education, 47(3), 283-310.
Kane R., Sandretto S. & Heath C. 2004. An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasizing reflective practice. Higher Education, 47(3), 283-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016442.55338.24
Kember D. 1997. “A Reconceptualization of the research into university academic’s conceptions of teaching”. Learning and Instruction, 7 (3), 255-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X
Kember, D. & Kwan, K. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026569608656
Khandelwal K.A. 2009. Effective Teaching Behaviors in the College Classroom: A Critical Incident Technique from Students’ Perspective International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 21(3): 299-309 http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/ ISSN 1812-9129.
Kongsved S.M., Basnov M., Holm-Christensen K., et Hjollund N.H. 2007. Response Rate and Completeness of Questionnaires: A Randomized Study of Internet Versus Paper-and-Pencil Versions, Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2007 Jul-Sep; 9(3): e25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25
Kugel P. 1993. “How Professors Develop as Teachers”. Studies in Higher Education, 18 (3). 313-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079312331382241
Loiola F.A. & Tardif M. 2001. Formation pédagogique des professeurs d’université et conceptions de l’enseignement. Revue des Sciences de l’Education, 27(2), 305-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/009935ar
Martinazzi R. et Samples J. 2000. Characteristics and traits o effective professor. IEEE October 18 - 21, 2000 Kansas City, MO 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference F3F-8
Marsh H.W. 1981. The use of path analysis to estimate teacher and course effects in student ratings of instructional effectiveness. Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol 6, Issue 1, 47-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168200600106
Marsh H.W. & Roche L.A. 2000. Effects of grading leniency and low workloads on students’ evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 202-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.1.202
Mckeachie W. J .1969. Student Ratings of Faculty. AAUP Bulletin, 55, (4), 439-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40223857
Méliani V. 2013. Choisir l’analyse par théorisation ancrée : illustration des apports et des limites de la méthode. RECHERCHES QUALITATIVES – Hors-Série – N°15, 435-452.
Menges R.J. & Rando W.C. 1989. What are your assumptions? Improving instruction by examining theories. College Teaching, Vol. 37, No. 2, 54-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1989.9925478
Onwuegbuzie A. J. et Leech N. L. 2007. Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public, the Qualitative Report, 12 (2), 238-254. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR12-2/onwuegbuzie1.pdf.
Onwuegbuzie A.J., Witcher A.E., Collins K.M., Filer J.D., Wiedmaier C.D. et Moore C.W. (2007). Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A Validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed-method analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 113-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831206298169
Paillé P. 1994. « L’analyse par théorisation ancrée ». Cahiers de recherche sociologique, n° 23, 147-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1002253ar
Patrick J. et Smart R. 1998. An empirical evaluation of teacher effectiveness: The emergence of three critical factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 165-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230205
Polk J.A. 2006. Traits of Effective Teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), 23-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.107.4.23-29
Postareff L., & Lindblom=Ylänne S. 2008. Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008
Ramsden P. (2002). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413937
Ramsden P. 1991. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079112331382944
Romainville M. 2000. L’échec dans l’université de masse. Paris: Harmattan.
Rosenshine B.2012. Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know. American educator SPRING 2012.
Saafin S.M. 2005. An investigation into Arab students’ perceptions of effective EFL teachers at university level. Thèse de doctorat, Université d’Exeter, UK.
Samuelowicz K. & Bain J. D. 1992. Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138620
Säljö R. 1979. 'Learning about learning', Higher Education 8 (4), 443-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680533
Säljö R. 1981. Learning approach and outcome: Some empirical observations: Instructional Science, Vol. 10, No. 1 (APRIL 1981), pp. 47-65Published by: Springers table URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23368266. Accessed: 26/12/2014 10:21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124566
Saroyan A., Amendsyn C., Macapline L., Weston C., Winer L. et Gandell T. 2006. Un modèle de développement pédagogique pour l’enseignement universitaire, in Colet N. R. & Romainville M. 2006. La pratique enseignante en mutation à l’université. Bruxelles : De Boeck.
Stronge J.H. et Hindman J.L. 2003. Hiring the Best Teachers, Educational Leadership, 60 (8),
-52.
Trigwell K & Prosser M. 2004. Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory, Educational Psychology Review, 16, No. 4, 409–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
Trigwell K., Prosser M. et Taylor P. 1994. 'Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science', Higher Education V.27, No. 1, 75-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383761
Tuckman B. W. 1995. Assessing effective teaching. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(2), 127-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01619569509538827
Van der Maren J. 1996. La recherche qualitative peut-elle être rigoureuse ? Cahier de recherche n° 96, Novembre, 11-11.
Van Driel J. H., Verloop N., Inge van Werven H., & Dekkers H. 1997. Teachers' craft
knowledge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education. Higher Education, 34(1),
-122.
Yates G. 2005. How obvious: Personal reflections on the database of educational psychological and effective teaching research. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 681-700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345180
Young S., & Shaw D.G. 1999. Profile of effective college and university teachers. Journal of DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2649170
Higher Education, 70(6), 670–686.