Moroccan university teachers’ conception about effective teaching
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study has two objectives: (1) to determine the characteristics of effective teaching from the point of view of higher education teachers; and (2) identify their understanding of this concept. The authors attempted to achieve these goals through a survey. Twelve university teachers, from the life sciences department of the science faculty, were asked to respond to a qualitative questionnaire. The results allowed us to list 23 characteristics of effective teaching. Their distribution into categories, allowed us to conclude that the teachers constituting our sample adopt an effective teaching concept centred on the student.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
References
Adams C.M. & Pierce R.L. 2008. Characteristics of effective teaching. www.bsu.edu/gradschool/media/pdf/chapiter12.pdf.
Allan J, Clarke K et Jopling M. 2009. Effective teaching in higher education: perceptions of first year undergraduate students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2009, 21 (3), 362-372.
Babbie E. 2008. The Practice of Social Research, 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Baumann E.K. 2007. All Are Called: Personality and Effective Teaching. CSE Volume 10 Number 3, 10-11
Becker D. M. 2010. Teaching Teachers About Teaching Students, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1105. Available at: http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol87/iss5/4
Biggs J. et Tang C. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University Third Edition. The Society for Research into Higher Education. Open University Press
Brown G. et Atkins M. 2002. Effective teaching in higher, first published 1988 by Methuen & Co. Ltd., This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Buskist W. 2002. Effective teaching: perspectives and insights from division two’s 2 and 4 year awardees. Teaching of psychology, V29(3), 188-193
Chickering A.W. et Gamson Z.F. 1987. Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, AAHE Bulletin, 3-7.
Chism N.V.N. 2004.Characteristics of effective teaching in higher education: Between definitional despair and certainty. Journal on Excellence in college teaching, 15 (3), 5-36.
Clark J. 1995. Suggestions for Effective University Teaching. Retrieved from http://io.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark/acad/teach/effteach.html
Coe R., Aloisi C., Higgins S. et Major L.E. 2014. 'What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research.', Project Report. Sutton Trust, London.
Cohen L., Manion L.et Morrison K. 2000. Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Davis B.G. 1993.Tools for Teaching, A Publication in The Jossey-Bass Higher and adult education series, Copyright © 1993 by jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Dall'Alba G. 1991. Foreshadowing conceptions of teaching. Dans B. Ross (Ed.). Teaching for effective learning. Research and Development in Higher Education. Vol. 13, 293-297). Sydney: Herdsa.
Delaney J., Johnson A., Johnson T. et Treslan D. 2010. Students’ perceptions of effective teaching in higher education. The Morning Watch, 37, Nos. 3-4. Available from http://www.mun.ca/educ/faculty/mwatch/laura_treslan_SPETHE_Paper.pdf
Demougeot-Lebel J. & Perret C. 2010. Identifier les conceptions de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage pour accompagner le développement professionnel des enseignants débutants à l’université. Savoirs, (23), 51-72.
Devlin M. 2007. Improving teaching in tertiary education: Institutional and individual influences. Keynote address at Excellence in Education and Training Convention, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore.
Dunkin M. J.1990.The induction of academic staff to a university: processes and products', Higher Education20, 47-66.
Feldman K. A. 1976. The superior college teacher from the student’s views. Research on Higher Education, 5, 243-288.
Feldman K.A. 1997. Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: evidence from student ratings. In R.P. Perry and J.C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp.368-395). New York: Agathon Press Kane R., Sandretto S. &
Fox, D. 1983. Personal Theories of Teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 8 (2), 151-163.
Friesen E. et Kristjanson C. 2007. A handbook Teaching at the University of Manitoba. University Teaching Services. The University of Manitoba, 3rd ed
Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The Impact of Training of University Teachers on Their Teaching Skills, Their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of Their Students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87-100.
Goe L., Bell C. et Little O. 2008. Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: A Research Synthesis; National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness—1 June
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
Handwerk, Carson et Blackwell. 2000. On-Line Vs. Paper-And-Pencil Surveying of Students: A Case Study, 19p.; Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research (40th, Cincinnati, OH, May 21-24,2000). ED 446512.
Heath C. 2004. An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasizing reflective practice. Higher Education, 47(3), 283-310.
Kane R., Sandretto S. & Heath C. 2004. An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasizing reflective practice. Higher Education, 47(3), 283-310.
Kember D. 1997. “A Reconceptualization of the research into university academic’s conceptions of teaching”. Learning and Instruction, 7 (3), 255-275.
Kember, D. & Kwan, K. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.
Khandelwal K.A. 2009. Effective Teaching Behaviors in the College Classroom: A Critical Incident Technique from Students’ Perspective International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 21(3): 299-309 http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/ ISSN 1812-9129.
Kongsved S.M., Basnov M., Holm-Christensen K., et Hjollund N.H. 2007. Response Rate and Completeness of Questionnaires: A Randomized Study of Internet Versus Paper-and-Pencil Versions, Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2007 Jul-Sep; 9(3): e25.
Kugel P. 1993. “How Professors Develop as Teachers”. Studies in Higher Education, 18 (3). 313-328.
Loiola F.A. & Tardif M. 2001. Formation pédagogique des professeurs d’université et conceptions de l’enseignement. Revue des Sciences de l’Education, 27(2), 305-326.
Martinazzi R. et Samples J. 2000. Characteristics and traits o effective professor. IEEE October 18 - 21, 2000 Kansas City, MO 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference F3F-8
Marsh H.W. 1981. The use of path analysis to estimate teacher and course effects in student ratings of instructional effectiveness. Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol 6, Issue 1, 47-60.
Marsh H.W. & Roche L.A. 2000. Effects of grading leniency and low workloads on students’ evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 202-228.
Mckeachie W. J .1969. Student Ratings of Faculty. AAUP Bulletin, 55, (4), 439-444.
Méliani V. 2013. Choisir l’analyse par théorisation ancrée : illustration des apports et des limites de la méthode. RECHERCHES QUALITATIVES – Hors-Série – N°15, 435-452.
Menges R.J. & Rando W.C. 1989. What are your assumptions? Improving instruction by examining theories. College Teaching, Vol. 37, No. 2, 54-60.
Onwuegbuzie A. J. et Leech N. L. 2007. Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public, the Qualitative Report, 12 (2), 238-254. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR12-2/onwuegbuzie1.pdf.
Onwuegbuzie A.J., Witcher A.E., Collins K.M., Filer J.D., Wiedmaier C.D. et Moore C.W. (2007). Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A Validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed-method analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 113-160.
Paillé P. 1994. « L’analyse par théorisation ancrée ». Cahiers de recherche sociologique, n° 23, 147-181.
Patrick J. et Smart R. 1998. An empirical evaluation of teacher effectiveness: The emergence of three critical factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 165-178.
Polk J.A. 2006. Traits of Effective Teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), 23-29.
Postareff L., & Lindblom=Ylänne S. 2008. Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109-120.
Ramsden P. (2002). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Ramsden P. 1991. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129-150.
Romainville M. 2000. L’échec dans l’université de masse. Paris: Harmattan.
Rosenshine B.2012. Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know. American educator SPRING 2012.
Saafin S.M. 2005. An investigation into Arab students’ perceptions of effective EFL teachers at university level. Thèse de doctorat, Université d’Exeter, UK.
Samuelowicz K. & Bain J. D. 1992. Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–112.
Säljö R. 1979. 'Learning about learning', Higher Education 8 (4), 443-451.
Säljö R. 1981. Learning approach and outcome: Some empirical observations: Instructional Science, Vol. 10, No. 1 (APRIL 1981), pp. 47-65Published by: Springers table URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23368266. Accessed: 26/12/2014 10:21
Saroyan A., Amendsyn C., Macapline L., Weston C., Winer L. et Gandell T. 2006. Un modèle de développement pédagogique pour l’enseignement universitaire, in Colet N. R. & Romainville M. 2006. La pratique enseignante en mutation à l’université. Bruxelles : De Boeck.
Stronge J.H. et Hindman J.L. 2003. Hiring the Best Teachers, Educational Leadership, 60 (8),
-52.
Trigwell K & Prosser M. 2004. Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory, Educational Psychology Review, 16, No. 4, 409–424.
Trigwell K., Prosser M. et Taylor P. 1994. 'Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science', Higher Education V.27, No. 1, 75-84.
Tuckman B. W. 1995. Assessing effective teaching. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(2), 127-138.
Van der Maren J. 1996. La recherche qualitative peut-elle être rigoureuse ? Cahier de recherche n° 96, Novembre, 11-11.
Van Driel J. H., Verloop N., Inge van Werven H., & Dekkers H. 1997. Teachers' craft
knowledge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education. Higher Education, 34(1),
-122.
Yates G. 2005. How obvious: Personal reflections on the database of educational psychological and effective teaching research. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 681-700.
Young S., & Shaw D.G. 1999. Profile of effective college and university teachers. Journal of
Higher Education, 70(6), 670–686.