The French system of higher education grants Evaluation and control
Main Article Content
Abstract
The French model of National Education, developed from the Third Republic, is based on free education and equal opportunities in access to education and culture.
“The Nation guarantees equal access for children and adults to education, training and culture. The organization of free and secular public education at all levels is a duty of the state ”thus stipulates paragraph 13 of the Preamble to the Constitution of October 27, 1946.
Higher education scholarships are a tool of education policy which aims to ensure this fundamental principle of equality. Like any public policy, it must be monitored, evaluated and steered, in particular within the framework of the new financial constitution of August 1, 2001, called the Organic Law relating to Finance Laws (I.G.A.E.N.R., 2007).
In 2008, 1.48 billion euros were spent on scholarships, of which more than 89% were scholarships on social criteria intended to benefit around 487,000 students (Marini, 2007). This figure represents around a quarter of students enrolled in higher education in France for the year 2007-2008 (M.E.S.R., 2009). If all the grants are taken into account, this percentage is around 30%.
However, several reports have raised a lack of tools and literature on the evaluation of the scholarship allocation system, a report from the 2006 parliamentary mission to the Minister of National Education, Higher Education and Research highlights in these terms the lack of monitoring and evaluation tools: "One of the findings of this report was the contrast between the considerable amount allocated to this policy with, paradoxically, such little monitoring and control".
This work aims precisely to provide elements of evaluation and monitoring of this policy, by proposing an evaluation of the system of allocation of scholarships according to two axes - equity and efficiency - as well as an index making it possible to follow over time the level of the aid allocated and the extent of its coverage.
These analyzes and results are based on statistical studies carried out on the annual databases of student applicants for grants between 1998 and 2007, provided by the Department of Evaluation, Forecasting and Performance (DEPP) and on the data triennial surveys on “Living conditions of students” collected by the Observatory of student life (OVE).
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
References
Debene M., 2004, La LOLF et le pilotage pédagogique des académies, Paris, 2004, p. 1-9.
Inspection générale de l'administration de l'Education nationale et de la Recherche, 2007, La mesure de la performance dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre de la LOLF dans l'enseignement supérieur : rapport à Madame la Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, Paris, Ministère de l'éducation nationale, de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche.
Marini PH., 2007, Moyens des politiques publiques et dispositions spéciales (Seconde partie de la loi de finances). Annexe « recherche et enseignement supérieur », rapport général fait au nom de la commission des Finances, du contrôle budgétaire et des comptes économiques de la Nation (1) sur le projet de loi de finances pour 2008, adopté par l’Assemblée Nationale, Paris, Sénat, p.29-34.
Mélin-Soucramanien, F., 2009, Les Constitutions de la France de la Révolution à la IVème République, textes présentés par Ferdinand Mélin-Soucramanien, Paris, Dalloz, p. 306.
Ministere de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, 2009, Atlas régional : effectifs d’étudiants en 2007-2008, Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, DGESIP/DGRI, sous-direction des systèmes d’information et études statistiques, Paris, p. 33.
Theulière M., 2004, « les bourses de l’enseignement supérieur à la rentrée 2002 », note d’information de la Direction de la programmation et du développement, n° 2, p. 1-6.
Toulemonde B., 2002, La gratuité de l’enseignement : passé, présent, avenir, Ministère de la jeunesse, de l’éducation et de la recherche, Paris.
Toulemonde B., 2004, Pilotage pédagogique et pilotage par les résultats : quelle problématique ? Conférence au colloque régional de l’AFAE.
Wauquiez L., 2006, Les aides aux étudiants, les conditions de vie étudiante : Comment relancer l’ascenseur social ? Rapport de la mission confiée par Monsieur le Premier Ministre à L. Wauquiez, député de la Haute_Loire, Ministère de l’Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, Paris, la documentation française, p. 17-59.