On the importance of the macro-social factors that can determine the quality of research
Main Article Content
Abstract
In our paper, we will present some of the findings that we have obtained in the framework of an international research1. Although the call for papers of this conference did not exactly mention the topics we are about to introduce, we decided to present our results here since we find them rather challenging.
On one hand, it is in fact important to study the different mechanisms that can be introduced in the higher educational sector in order to assure quality in research (for example, creation of a policy of quality assurance within the institutions, or make it possible to find and follow up every single research, or introducing a protocol to be followed in terms of the documentation of the scientific researches etc). But on the other hand, it is also important to investigate into the conditions of research at the macro-sociological level, so at the level of the nation-state (in fact, such investigations could deal with the role of the supra-national agencies also, these latter having a growing influence on research activities.)
Our first research results in the last ten-fifteen years of educational research in Hungary show that the researches in the second part of the 20th century dealing with the working mechanisms of the educational system were in fact heavily influenced by some macro-sociological factors. First, one has to keep in mind that the majority of these researches were lead by publicly founded and managed research institutions, first of all by the Ministry of Education. Second, the Hungarian case also reveals the importance of the general characteristics of the ruling political regimes, for example, authoritarian functioning (like censorship and the hostility toward critical reflection) may constitute a serious barrier to social scientific research, particularly for educational research. As it will be demonstrated, this was particularly the case for Hungary in the first phase of pure communist dictatorship.
Third, research can be hindered simply by the lack of money. In this respect, one has to keep in mind that in general in Hungary and in many other countries these are the political authorities who are in the position to commission researches.
1 "žKnow and Pol" research is an Integrated Project funded by the European Commission under Priority Seven (Citizens and Governance) of the Sixth RTD Framework Programme. It deals with the relationship between knowledge and policy. For more information: www.knowandpol.eu
And of course, the presence of some or all of these barriers decreases the likeliness of commissioning (on behalf of the State) any big researches with the aim of studying a given public policy. In fact, even if Hungary became a pluralistic democracy from the end of the 1980ies on, where the liberty of opinion and human rights are respected, researches can still be hindered by institutional and financial dependence of the investigations.
In what follows we will try to outline the evolution of the institutional framework that in Hungary determined the nature of the researches on the educational system.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
"¢ Barta, à "“ Hàves, T "“ Kozma, T "“ Radà¡csi, I (2006) ,,Oktatà¡s Magyarorszà¡gon" [Education in Hungary ], In: ,,A tudà¡salapຠtà¡rsadalom kialakulà¡sa Magyarorszà¡gon" [The Formation of the Knowledge-based Society in Hungary], (ed.) Tamà¡s, P, Budapest, 2006. pp. 76-126.
"¢ Bartus, T "“ Lannert, J "“ Moksony, F "“ Németh, Sz -Papp Z, A "“ Szà¡ntà³, Z. (2005) "žA fejlesztéspolitikai intézkedések tà¡rsadalmi hatà¡sainak vizsgà¡lata" [Analysis of the Social Impacts of Development Policy Measures], Tà¡rki, Budapest, pp. 140-149.
"¢ Csapà³, B (2007) ,,Az oktatà¡si rendszer fejlesztésének tudomà¡nyos megalapozà¡sa, a kutatà¡si hà¡ttér kiépàtése" [The scientific bases of the development of education system, the development of the scientific background "“ study prepared for the Hungary Tomorrow Roundtable], http://oktatas.magyarorszagholnap.hu/wiki/Csap%C3%B3Ben%C5%91:Azoktat% C3%A1sirendszerfejleszt%C3%A9s%C3%A9nektudom%C3%A1nyosmegalapo z%C3%A1sa,akutat%C3%A1sih%C3%A1tt%C3%A9rki%C3%A9p%C3%ADt%C3 %A9se
"¢ Ferge, Zs (1971), ,,A tà¡rsadalmi struktàºra és az iskolarendszer kà¶zà¶tti néhà¡ny à¶sszefà¼ggés" [Some correlations between social structure and educational system], Szociolà³gia, 1971/1.
"¢ Halà¡sz, G (1984), ,,Az oktatà¡spolitika szerkezete a hatvanas-hetvenes években" [The
structure of educational politics int he sixties and seventies], Medvetà¡nc, 1984/2-3
"¢ Halà¡sz, G (1985): Az oktatà¡sirà¡nyàtà¡s korszerűsàtése és az oktatà¡s irà¡nyàtà³i "“ oktatà¡spolitikai elemzés [The modernization of educational regulation and the policy-makers "“ education policy analysis], National Institute of Public Education, Researches related to planning, Budapest, 1985, 104. p.
"¢ Halà¡sz G, (2002), ,,A neveléstudomà¡nyi kutatà¡sok finanszàrozà¡si és intézményi feltételei" [Financial and institutional conditions for pedagogic research], Magyar Pedagà³gia, 2002/1, pp. 105-122.
2 International Social Science Journal; 179 March 2004; Tracking Impact; Case studies on the social science "“ policy nexus)
"¢ Halà¡sz, G "“ Lannert, J (eds), (2004): "Education in Hungary 2003", National Institute of Public Education, Budapest, 2004.
"¢ Halà¡sz, G "“ PÅ‘cze, G, (1988) ,,A 6-os fÅ‘irà¡ny tà¶rténete" [The history of the 6th Directive], Public Education Research Secretary, Budapest,
"¢ Kozma T, (1990) ,,Versengés az iskolà¡ért" [Competition for school], In: K. T. ,,Kié az iskola?" [To whom the school belongs?] Educatio, Budapest, 1990, p. 227.
"¢ Lukà¡cs, P (1986) ,,A kà¶zéptà¡vຠoktatà¡stervezés kà¶zponti mechanizmusairà³l" [On the central mechanisms of mid-term educational planning] In: ,,A tervezés és dà¶ntés anatà³mià¡ja" [The anatomy of planning] Kozma, T (ed.), Budapest, Institute for Educational Research, 1986. pp. 57-165.
"¢ Lukà¡cs, P "“ Và¡rhegyi, Gy (eds.), (1989), ,,Csak reformot ne..." [Anything but Reforms], Edukà¡cià³, Budapest, 1989, p. 289.
"¢ Sà¡ska G. (1987) "Vizsgarendszer: Javaslat egy eredmény à¡ltal tà¶rténÅ‘ szabà¡lyozà¡s kialakàtà¡sà¡ra." [Examination system: proposition for developing output-regulation] Studies of the Evaluation Centre, (manuscript), OPI, 1987.