Econometric Analysis of Gender Disparities in STEM Enrollment and Performance in Sub-Saharan African Secondary Schools

Authors

  • SAINA PHILIPH KIPKOSGEI UNIVERSITY OF ELDORET

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37870/wkrn3537

Keywords:

ECONOMETRIC, GENDER, STEM

Abstract

Gender disparities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) remain among the most entrenched structural inequalities in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) secondary education, with far-reaching consequences for human capital development and inclusive economic growth. Despite incremental progress in achieving gender parity at the primary level, significant participation and performance gaps re-emerge and intensify within STEM tracks at the secondary level, constraining the region's long-term development trajectory. This study presents a rigorous, multi-method econometric analysis of gender gaps in STEM enrollment and examination performance across five SSA countries—Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Ghana, and Nigeria—using a pooled dataset of 1,423,807 upper secondary students spanning 2018 to 2023. The analytical framework integrates binary logistic regression and probit models to estimate the probability of STEM enrollment as a function of gender and a comprehensive set of socioeconomic and institutional covariates, alongside the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition technique to partition the gender performance gap in national examinations into explained (endowment) and unexplained (structural) components. Two-way panel fixed-effects models with country and year controls provide additional robustness. Descriptive results confirm that female students are 23.4 percentage points less likely to enroll in STEM tracks than their male counterparts. Logistic regression analysis yields a fully controlled log-odds estimate for the female indicator of −0.812 (Average Marginal Effect = −18.4 percentage points; p < 0.001). Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition reveals that 38.6% of the observed performance gap of 0.41 standard deviations is attributable to measurable endowment differences, while the remaining 61.4% is structurally unexplained, implicating stereotype threat, implicit teacher biases, gendered curricula, and cultural norms. The share of female STEM teachers emerges as a significant moderator of female performance. The study concludes with evidence-based policy recommendations directed at teacher recruitment and gender-responsive training, curriculum reform, conditional cash transfer programmes targeting STEM-enrolled girls, and equitable STEM infrastructure investment across rural and urban schools.

References

[1] UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

[2] World Bank. (2022). Closing the gender gap in education: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1950-1

[3] Klasen, S. (2018). The impact of gender inequality on economic performance in developing countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10(1), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-022918

[4] African Development Bank. (2023). African economic outlook 2023: Mobilizing private finance for Africa's development. African Development Bank Group.

[5] World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2023.pdf

[6] Arends-Kuenning, M., & Makanya, S. (2021). Gender and STEM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Barriers to female participation. International Journal of Educational Development, 82, Article 102376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102376

[7] Mlambo, V. H. (2020). Female STEM education in Africa: Challenges and opportunities. African Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.82.20.019

[8] Bhattacharjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, J. (2020). Econometric analysis of gender gap in education: Evidence from South Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 68, Article 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101199

[9] Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research.

[10] Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051

[11] Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818907

[12] Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M. T. (2016). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415616201

[13] Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797

[14] Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131221

[15] UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2023). Education statistics: All indicators. UIS Data Centre. http://data.uis.unesco.org

[16] UNICEF. (2022). Gender and education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Closing the STEM gap. UNICEF Regional Office for Eastern and Southern Africa.

[17] Rwanda Education Board. (2023). Annual education statistics abstract 2023. Ministry of Education, Government of Rwanda.

[18] Kenya National Examinations Council. (2023). 2022 KCSE examination report. KNEC.

[19] Tanzania National Examinations Council. (2023). CSEE 2022 examination statistics and chief examiner's report. NECTA.

[20] West African Examinations Council. (2023). 2022 WASSCE chief examiner's report: Science and mathematics. WAEC.

[21] Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to investment in education: A decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26(5), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426

[22] Muralidharan, K., & Prakash, N. (2017). Cycling to school: Increasing secondary school enrolment for girls in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160004

[23] Delprato, M., Akyeampong, K., Sabates, R., & Hernandez-Fernandez, J. (2015). The impact of early marriage on schooling and literacy in Sub-Saharan Africa and South West Asia. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.06.001

[24] Dee, T. S. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 528–554. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XLII.3.528

[25] Scantlebury, K. (2012). Gender issues in science education research: Remembering the past, recognizing the present, and looking toward the future. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 262–271). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_20

[26] Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. A. (2014). The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociology of Education, 87(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714547770

[27] Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387

[28] Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

[29] Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525981

[30] Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/144855

[31] Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data (6th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5

[32] ICF International. (2022). The DHS program: Demographic and health surveys [Data file and codebook]. https://www.dhsprogram.com

[33] Neumark, D. (1988). Employers' discriminatory behavior and the estimation of wage discrimination. Journal of Human Resources, 23(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/145830

[34] Glewwe, P., & Kremer, M. (2006). Schools, teachers, and education outcomes in developing countries. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 945–1017). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02016-2

[35] Karbownik, K., & Myck, M. (2017). Same-sex educators and student outcomes: Short- and long-run evidence. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(4), 912–942. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22008

[36] Unterhalter, E. (2019). The many meanings of quality education: Politics of targets and indicators in SDG4. Global Policy, 10(Suppl. 1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12591

[37] Ghana Education Service. (2022). Annual schools census report 2022. Ministry of Education, Republic of Ghana.

[38] Baird, S., McIntosh, C., & Özler, B. (2011). Cash or condition? Evidence from a cash transfer experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1709–1753. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr032

[39] Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352

[40] Stampini, M., & Tornarolli, L. (2012). The growth of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean: Did they go too far? (IZA Policy Paper No. 49). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://docs.iza.org/pp49.pdf

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

PHILIPH KIPKOSGEI, S. (2026). Econometric Analysis of Gender Disparities in STEM Enrollment and Performance in Sub-Saharan African Secondary Schools. The Journal of Quality in Education, 16(28), 28-57. https://doi.org/10.37870/wkrn3537

Similar Articles

11-20 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.