Analysis of Declared Pedagogical Practices in STEM Education in Morocco
Main Article Content
Abstract
Internationally, we observe that the results of Moroccan students in mathematics are significantly lower than the average results of students from other countries. This observation, could in part, be explained by maintaining an approach based on the transmission of knowledge which does not promote the development of student skills. Since STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) based instruction has been shown to have a positive impact on student achievement in mathematics, we explored the teaching and assessment practices reported by five Moroccan teachers in order to identify practices that would be compatible with teaching based on STEM. Although only one participant said they knew this approach, our results indicate that all participants have practices compatible with an integrated approach to STEM. These results outline a future where teachers and researchers will work together to implement STEM-based education and explore, in the Moroccan context, the scope and limits of such education.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 202-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8561
Allaire, D. (1988). Questionnaires: mesure verbale du comportement. Fondements et étapes de la recherche scientifique en psychologie, 3, 229-275.
Allal, L. (2002). Acquisition et évaluation des compétences en situation scolaire. L’énigme de la compétence en éducation, 77-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.dolz.2002.01.0075
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., & Boyer, M. A. (2013). Promoting positive academic dispositions using a web-based PBL environment: The GlobalEd 2 project. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1389
Charlot, B. (1999). Du rapport au savoir. Éléments pour une théorie. Paris : Anthropos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionscnrs.31266
Charron, A. (2004). La description de pratiques d’orthographes approchées d’enseignantes du préscolaire en contexte québécois: une réflexion méthodologique. In Actes du 9e colloque de l’AIRDF (1-14). http://www. colloqueairdf. fse. ulaval. ca/actes
CSEFRS. (2007). Étude évaluative des curricula des cycles primaire et secondaire collégial - RAPPORT DE SYNTHESE. Rami Abderrahmane (Ed.). Rabat, Maroc
CSEFRS. (2015-2030). Pour une école de l'équité, de la qualité et de la promotion - Vision stratégique de la réforme 2015-2030. Rabat, Maroc. https://www.csefrs.ma/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Vision_VF_Fr.pdf
D'Hainaut, L. (1986). L’interdisciplinarité dans l’enseignement général. Paris: Division des sciences de l'éducation, des contenus et des méthodes, UNESCO. http://www. unesco. org/education/pdf/31_14_f. pdf.
Fajrina, S., Lufri, L., & Ahda, Y. (2020). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) as a Learning Approach to Improve 21st Century Skills: A Review. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 16(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i07.14101
Gresnigt, R., Taconis, R., van Keulen, H., Gravemeijer, K., & Baartman, L. (2014). Promoting science and technology in primary education: a review of integrated curricula. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 47-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694
Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a
Hasanah, U. (2020). Key definitions of STEM education: Literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3), e2217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
Joannert, P., Barrette, J., Boufrahi, S., & Masciotra, D. (2005). Compétences, constructivisme et interdisciplinarité, conditions essentielles au développement des programmes d'études. Rapport de recherche présenté au Ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. Montréal : Observatoire des réformes en éducation (ORE) et Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche sur l’apprentissage et le développement en éducation (CIRADE).
Lenoir, Y. (1991). Relation entre interdisciplinarité et intégration des apprentissages dans l'enseignement des programmes d'études du primaire au Québec. Université de Paris VII, Paris.
Lenoir, Y., Larose, F., Grenon, V., & Hasni, A. (2000). La stratification des matières scolaires chez les enseignants du primaire au Québec: évolution ou stabilité des représentations depuis 1981. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 26(3), 483-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/000288ar
Lenoir, Y., & Sauvé, L. (1998). Introduction. L’interdisciplinarité et la formation à l’enseignement primaire et secondaire : quelle interdisciplinarité pour quelle formation ? Revue des sciences de l'éducation, vol. 24, n° 1, 3-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/031959ar
Leroux, J. L. (2007). L’évaluation des compétences au collégial. Les compétences professionnelles en enseignement et leur évaluation, 213-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cn6tf9.20
Leroux, J. L., & Bigras, N. (2003). Lévaluation des compétences. Une réalité accessible dans nos collèges. Cégep de Saint-Hyacinthe: Regroupement des collèges Performa.
Maingain, A., & Dufour, B. (2002). La pédagogie des compétences dans la perspective de la transdisciplinarité. . In G. Fourez (Ed.), Approches didactiques de l’interdisciplinarité (pp. 181-198). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Martín‐Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales‐Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez‐González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
MEQ. (2001). Programme de formation de l’école québécoise. Québec: Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics (Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College).
Mullis, I. V., Erberber, E., & Preuschoff, C. (2007). The TIMSS 2007 international benchmarks of student achievement in mathematics and science. TIMSS, 339-347.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. ERIC.
Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Mohamad Said, M. N. H. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225-4228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8111
Ourahay, M., El Gharras & S. Rouan, O. (2015). Essai d'explication du niveau faible des performances mathématiques des élèves marocains des cycles primaire et secondaire collégial. Actes du Colloque EMF 2015, p. 1028-1041.
Perrenoud, P. (2000). L'approche par compétences une réponse à l'échec scolaire? 71-21356 Réussir au collégial.
Psycharis, S. (2016). The impact of computational experiment and formative assessment in inquiry-based teaching and learning approach in STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 316-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9595-z
Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S.-C. (2015). STEM and technology education: International state-of-the-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 429-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z
Sanders, M. (2009) STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4). 20-26
Senécal, I., & Desjardins, J. (2018). La pédagogie active. Retrieved May, 6, 2020.
Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., Maat, S. M., & Capraro, M. M (2020). The Effect of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Program on Students' Achievement in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5885
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. (Vol. Autodesk Foundation). San Rafael: California.
Vilatte, J.-C. (2007). Méthodologie de l’enquête par questionnaire. Laboratoire Culture & Communication Université d’Avignon.
Widowati, C., Purwanto, A., & Akbar, Z. (2021). Problem-Based Learning Integration in Stem Education to Improve Environmental Literation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(7), 374-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i7.2836