Gender Equality within HR Practices in Higher Education Institutions The Case of the Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (USEK)
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Human Resource Management (HRM) may be considered as a tool to improve gender equality by citing equal opportunities as a key of Personnel policy focusing on developing people, valuing diversity, and enabling the promotion of equality to be linked to the achievement of organizational goals (Linda, 1998). The recruitment and selection process could be affected by several factors leading to inequality between men and women for occupying top managerial positions, such as the societal factors including gender role stereotypeand the organizational factor including the male dominated organization and discriminatory organizational culture.
This paper will focus on gender equality in recruitment and selection process mainly in the scope of top managerial opportunities based on the case study of USEKthat benchmarks international best practices and that aims to be considered as the leader institution in Lebanon and region for enhancing the empowerment of women and improving women's career advancement.It will study to what extent gender role stereotype and organizational culture, policies and practices affect Women's career advancement for top managerial positions in Lebanese Higher Education Institutions. Through primary and secondary collected through surveys and interviews, the paper will demonstrate:first,if the recruitment and selection process for top managerial positions could be affected in advance by gender bias and organizational culture; second,if the existence of gender equality policy in the workplace could be an efficient solution to avoid gender discrimination and prejudgment within all HR practices.
Renseignements sur l'article
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Références
Bach S. (2005), Managing Human Resources, Oxford: Blackwell.
Boerlijst, G. and Meijboom, G. (1989), Matching the individual and the organization in P. Harriot (ed), London John Wlley and Sons Ltd.
Cleveland, J., Stockdale, M. and Murphy, K. (2000), Women and Men in Organizations: Sex and Gender Issues at Work, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Connell, R. (2006). Glass ceiling or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites.Public Administration Review, 66, 837-849.
DiBenedetto, B. and Tittle, C. (1990), "Gender and adult roles: role commitment of women and men in a job-family trade-off context", Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 37, pp. 41-8.
Eagly, A. (1987), Sex Differences in Social Behaviour: A Social Role Interpretation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Ely, R. and Pavadic, I. (2007). A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences, Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1121-1143
Flippo, E.B. (1984), Personnel Management, Six Edition, McGraw Hill, Book Company.
Gary, D. (2013). Human Resource Management. United States: Pearson Education
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1998). Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organization Studies, 19, 477-493.
Kay, F.M. and Hagan, J., "˜The Persisting Glass Ceiling: Gendered Inequalities in the Earnings of Lawyers', 1995, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 46, pp. 279-310.
Kottke, J.L. and Agars, M.D. (2005), "Understanding the processes that facilitate and hinder efforts to advance women in organizations", Career Development International, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 190-202.
Linda, D. (1998). What HRM means for gender equality. Human Resource Management Journal, 8(1), 23
Meyerson, Debra E., and Deborah M. Kolb 2000 "˜Moving out of the "armchair": Developing a framework to bridge the gap between feminist theory and practice'. Organization 7/4: 553"“571.
Nentwich, Julia 2006 "˜changing gender: The discursive construction of equal opportunities'. Gender, Work & Organization 13/6: 499"“521.
Powell, G. and Graves, L. (2003), Women and Men in Management, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Randal. S.S. and Susan E.J. (1987) Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Management Practices. The academy of management EXECUTIVE
Schein, V.E. (2007), "Women in management reflections and projections", Women in Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 6-18.
Stonner, Freeman & Gilbert (Jr.), (2000), Management 6th Edition, India Prentice Hall
Talbot, M. (2003), "Gender stereotypes: reproduction and challenge", in Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (Eds), The Handbook of Language and Gender, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 468-86.
Vinnicombe S. & Singh V. (2002).Sex role stereotyping and requisites of successful top managers.Women in Management Review. 17(3/4). 120-130
Walby, Sylvia 2004 "˜The European Union and gender equality: Emergent varieties of gender regime'. Social Policy 11/1: 4"“29.