Pedagogical Tools in the 21st Century
Main Article Content
Abstract
Neuro-Linguistic Programming has attracted considerable attention in many different areas of life mainly in education. In this context, the major aim of this paper was to explore the implications and effect of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques in English language Teaching and Learning in the Moroccan context. Qualitative and Quantitative methods are used. In this study, we included 2 teachers with and without NLP experience as well as 2 groups including 43 students. Our results stated that after implementing NLP techniques in the classroom, teacher and learners participate together to create a positive atmosphere, increase productivity, motivate themselves to achieve excellence and reach their desired outcome not only inside the classroom but also in their personal life.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Bandler, R., and Grinder, j.( 1975). The structure of Magic, Volume I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Palo Alto CA: Science & Behaviour Books.
Bandler, R. and Grinder, j. (1976). The structure of Magic, Volume II. Palo Alto CA: Science & Behaviour Books.
Carey, J.,Churches, R., Hutchinson, G., Jones, J., Tosey, P. ( 2009) Neuro- Linguistic Programming and learning: teacher case studies on the impact of NLP in education, Reading: CFBT Education Trust.
Childers Jr., J. H ( 1985). Neuro- Linguistic Programming: Enhancing teacher_student communication. Journal of Humanistic Education 24( 1), 32-39
Churches, R. and West-Burnham, J. (2009) Leading learning through relationships: the implication of Neuro-Linguistic Programming for personalisation and the Children's Agenda in England, in P. Tosey, ( ed), Current research in NLP, vol 1: proceedings of the first international NLP research conference, University of Surrey, 5 july 2008, south Mimms, Hertfordshire: ANLP international CIC, pp.126-136
Cupane, G. (2004). Use of the elements of Neuro- Linguistic Programming in the enhancement of the acquisition of the English. Pedago ija, 71
O'Connor, J., and Seymour, J.( 1990). Introducing Neuro- Linguistic Programming: Psychological Skills For Understanding And Influencing People. Great Britain: England.
O'Connor, J. (2001). The NLP Workbook : A practical Guide to Achieving the results you Want. London: Element
Hamilton, R. ( 2003). The NLP spelling strategy. Humanizing Language Teaching. 5( 1)
Millrood, R. ( 2004). The role of NLP in teachers' classroom discourse. ELT journal. Vol. 58(1) January 2004. Oxford university press
Kudliskis, V., & Burden, R.(2009). Applying "˜ what works' in psychology to enhancing examination success in schools: The potential contribution of NLP. Thinking Skills and Creativity 4( 3), 170-177
Pishgham, R., Shapoori, M., and Shayesteh, S.,( 2011). NLP and its relationship with teacher success, gender, teaching experience, and degree: A comparative study". World journal of English language, 1(2) 2-8
Revell, J. and Norman, S. (1997). In your hands: NLP in ELT. London: Safire Press.
Revell, J. and Norman, S. (1999). Handing over- NLP based Activities for language learning. London: safire Press.
Rosenberg. M. (1986). The how of thinking. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
Targutay, M. ( 2010). The role of Neuro Linguistic Programming in English Language Teaching: NLP- trained Language Teaching Practitioners' Perceptions About NLP Strategies And Techniques used in Classes. Dissertation thesis
Tosey, P. ( 2008). "˜ it's a living thing': A Neuro- Linguistic Programming perspective on essay Writing. Humanising Language Teaching, 10(5).
Tosey, P., & Mathison, J. ( 2003). Neuro- Linguistic Programming: its potential for learning and teaching in formal education. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Hamburg, 17-20 September 2003.
Tosey, P., Mathison, J., & Michili, D. (2005). Mapping transformative learning: the potential of neuro-linguistic programming. Journal of Transformative Education, 3(2), 140-167
Tosey, P., & Mathison, J., ( 2010). Neuro- Linguistic Programming As An Innovation in Education And Teaching. International,47(3), 317-326
Yero, J. L. ( 2001). NLP and Education: A shift of focus. Anchor Point Magazine, 15, 9.
Yero, J.L. ( 2002). Teaching in mind: how teacher thinking shape education. Hamilton, MT: Mind Flight Publishing.
Vaknin, sh. (2008). The big book of NLP techniques: 200+ patterns Methods & strategies of Neuro Linguistic Programming. ISBN
Vieira, C.R. and Gaspar, M.F. (2012). Plenatitude: teacher education for effectiveness and well- being with neuro-linguistic programming, 4th Association for Teacher Education in Europe Winter Conference, Coimbra, 4th September