Municipal and University Social Partnership in Latvia Problems, Challenges

Main Article Content

Baiba Rivza
Veronika Bikse


The key tasks of higher education are to provide a study process of high quality to prepare professionals according to the market requirements and to create new knowledge and transfer it to the national economy to foster the development of society. Higher education institutions can fulfill these requirements only in cooperation with various other institutions. Nowadays, the further development of this cooperation requires viewing it in a broader sense "“ in the aspect of the partnership. The paper mainly examines social partnerships between local governments and higher educational institutions to contribute to tackling common problems and reconciling interests, which is a significant precondition for regional development. In Latvia, social partnership is at the early stage of development. The overall aim of the paper is to examine theoretical findings and, based on them, to identify the views and recommendations of local governments regarding balancing the performance of regional higher education institutions (HEI) and the needs of society. The first part of the paper reviews the theoretical aspects of social partnership and analyses the possibilities to use social partnerships in regions. The second part focuses on the present situation in the regions and describes best practices of social partnership and  the development trends in social partnership in Latvia's regions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rivza, B., & Bikse, V. (2014). Municipal and University Social Partnership in Latvia: Problems, Challenges. The Journal of Quality in Education, 4(5), 8.


Doyle, M. Economic benefits from Social partnership. European Commission (EC). The European social dialogue, a force for innovation and change, EK, 2002.

Egle, E., Karnīte, R. Sociālā partnerība un tirgus ekonomika Latvija. Sarunas ar Latvijas uzņēmējiem. Izdevējs SIA Lietišķās informācijas dienests, Rīga, 2008.

Giguere, S. Local partnerships for better governance, OECD, 2001.

Gramberg, M. Citizens as Partners. OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making, OECD, 2001.

ILO, Key Features of Social Dialogue: A Social Dialogue Resource Book., In Focus Programme on Social Dialogue, Labour Law and Labour Administration,, 2006.

Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R., Koztwinder, E. Business and partnership for development. In: European Management Journal. Volume 26, Issue 4, p. 262 – 273, 2007. DOI:

Meņšikovs, V. Izglītības paradigma un sociālais dialogs, SAK, 2007.

Moseley, M. Local partnership for Rural Development, The European Experience. CABI Publishing, 2003. DOI:

OECD LEED, Forum for Partnerships and Local Governance, Successful Partnerships. A Guide,, 2009b.

OECD, Local Governance and Partnerships, OECD, 2001a.

OECD, Local Governance and Partnerships. A Summary of the Findings of the OECD Study on Local Partnerships, 2001b.

Ozola, Z. Sociālā partnerība Latvijas reģionos: piemēri, analīze, attīstība. Latvijas Darba devēju konfederācija, 2010.

Project of Universities Investments in Latvian Economy (UILE). Rīga, SKDS, 2011.

Social partnerships. Guideline principles on their Establishment and Operation within the European Union (EU), 2004.,

Teague, P. What is Enterprise Partnership? Organization, Volume 12 (4), p. 567-589, 2005. DOI:

Turok, I. Innovation in Local Governance: the Irish Partnership Model, University of Glasgow, 2008.

Turok, I. Urban Partnerships with Purpose, Presentation to OECD seminar, Lisbon, 2007.

Walsh, J. Disability in a Sustainable Human Environment. Keynote presentation at the UN conference „Designing for the 21th Century” Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 7th-12th December 2004.,

Walsh, J. Partnership Theory and Practice. Part one. In: Partnership for Effective Local development. CREADEL PUBLICATION Nr.2, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, p. 7 – 28, 2004.