The impact of programme accreditation in a transformed higher education institution Challenges and Successes
Main Article Content
Abstract
The perception held by academic staff of programme re-accreditation has been a major problem in South African Higher Education Institutions. Academics are concerned about the influence of the government in their daily operation, while the government claims that they want to be accountable to the public for money spent on Higher Education. To a large extent, academics believe that the role of the government amounts to interfering rather than being accountable and that the academic freedom of academics has been violated. The participants of the study were academics from the School of Teacher Education at the Central University of Technology, Free State. Questionnaires, documentary analysis, and interviews were used as the main data collection instruments. The study revealed that a negative perception amongst academic staff existed with regard to programme re-accreditation. Furthermore, the study also established that it is still difficult for academic staff to identify the difference between the role played by the government (accountability) and as compared to academic freedom.
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Council on Higher Education: (2003). The state of Private Higher Education in South Africa. Pretoria: CHE.
Department of Education. (1999). Higher Education Institutional Plans: Guidelines for the Second Planning Phase "“ 2000/2002. Pretoria.
Education White Paper 3: A Programme for the Transformation of Higher Education, 1997. Pretoria: Department of Education.
Fourie, M. (2000). A System Approach to Quality Assurance and Self-evaluation. South African Journal of Higher Education, 14(2): 16-26.
Geyser, H.C. and Wolhuter, C.C (2000). Career paths of education graduates and the implications thereof for higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education 15(2):93-96.
Hay, D. and Fourie, M. (1999). Using Emancipatory Action Research for Implementing Self-Evaluation in South Africa Higher Education quality assurance. South African Journal of Higher Education, 13(2): 44-53.
Higher Education Quality Committee (2001). Founding Document. Pretoria: Council for Higher Education.
Jacobs, D.J. (2000). A Future Quality Assurance scenario for South African Higher Education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 14(2): 69-74.
Kells, H.R. (1995). Building a National Evaluation System for Higher Education: Lessons from the Diverse Settings. Higher Education in Europe, XX (1-2): 18-25.
Lategan, L.O.K. (1997). Defining Quality for South African Universities. In: Strydom, A.H.; Lategan, L.O.K. & Muller, A. Enhancing Institutional Self-evaluation and Quality in South African Higher Education: National and International Perspectives. Bloemfontein: URHE.
Lategan, L.O.K. (1997). Reflections on an Institutional Audit at a University based Self-evaluation. In: Strydom, A.H.; Lategan, L.O.K. & Muller, A. Enhancing Institutional Self-evaluation and Quality in South African Higher Education: National and International Perspectives. Bloemfontein: URHE.
National Commission on Higher Education: (1996). A Framework for Transformation. 1996. Pretoria: HRSC.
Nilson, S. (1997). Quality as Transformation: Professional Development and Course Evaluation. Academic Development, 3 (1): 9-20.
NPHE (National Plan for Higher Education in South Africa) (2001). Department of Education. Pretoria: NPHE.
Ratcliff, J. (1997). Institutional Self-evaluation and Quality Assurance: A Global view. In: Strydom, A.H.; Lategan, L.O.K. & Muller, A. Enhancing Institutional Self-evaluation and Quality in South African Higher Education: National and International Perspectives. Bloemfontein: URHE.
Republic of South Africa (1995). South African Qualification Authority Act (Act 58 of 1995). Pretoria: Government Printer.
Republic of South Africa. Department of Education (RSA DoE 1997). A programme for higher education transformation: Education White Paper 3. Pretoria: Department of Education
Republic of South Africa (1997). Higher Education Act (Act 101 of 1997). Pretoria: Government Printer.
Sallis, J. (1994). From systems to leadership: the development of the quality movement in further education. In: Doherty, G.D. (Ed.). Development Systems in Education. London: Routledge.
Smout M. (2002). Quality Assurance in South African Universities. SAUVCA
Strydom, A.H., and Van der Westhuizen, L. (2001). A guide for Institutional Quality Assurance and Management based on Self-Evaluation in Higher Education. Unit for Research into Higher Education. University of the Free State. Bloemfontein.
Van Vught, R.(1994). Quality Management and quality assurance in European Higher education. Enschede: CHEPS.
Vroeijestijn, T. (2001). How to assure quality in higher education. A joint publication between Unisa and Technikon S.A.